The grammatical function of the keyword phrase hinges on the part of speech assigned to the word "remains." It can be interpreted in two distinct ways: either as a verb, indicating persistence, or as a noun, referring to physical remnants. This determination is the central point because it fundamentally alters the subject and meaning of the article.
When "remains" functions as a verb (third-person singular, present tense), the subject is the singular event concept, "September 11th." The phrase asserts that the influence, memory, or impact of the event continues to exist and affect the present. This interpretation focuses on the intangible legacythe lasting political, social, and psychological consequences. Conversely, when "remains" is a plural noun, "September 11th" acts as an adjectival modifier. The phrase then refers to the tangible, physical materials recovered from the attack sites, such as human remains, building wreckage, and personal artifacts.
Consequently, the selected part of speech dictates the article's entire thematic direction. Choosing the verb necessitates an analysis of abstract concepts like historical memory, foreign policy shifts, or societal trauma. Opting for the noun directs the content toward a concrete examination of forensic science, archaeology, the process of victim identification, and the memorialization of physical objects. Therefore, defining whether "remains" is the action of enduring or the physical objects left behind is the crucial first step in establishing the article's thesis and scope.
